Categories
Ealing and Northfield National politics

False Economy? Unfair economy certainly

The union backed campaign website False Economy did well this morning to get its report on charities losing cash from local councils onto the BBC News website front page and I heard it listed 5th on the Radio 4 9am new bulletin, see BBC story here.

False Economy is backed by public service unions such as Unison, PCS and FBU and the TUC itself. Key players are Alison Charlton, a Unison communications officer and Nigel Stanley, head of the TUC’s Campaigns and Communications Department. You get the picture.

It is the start of the silly season so you can half understand the BBC going for such a weak story. The BBC though is telling only half of it and it is ironic that it is the public service unions that are pointing out how council officers would rather rape and pillage the voluntary sector than look closely at their own staff numbers and terms and conditions. You only have to look at my own Labour council here in Ealing to get the picture.

In Ealing:

  • although the council is at great pains to dramatise the £85 million of savings it wishes to make as “cuts” almost half of this amount is its own growth (new spending commitments), additional borrowing costs and inflation. The cut in government grant does approach 30% but this is only about 12% in the council’s total income and expenditure.
  • in spite of massive changes to the council’s income there have been no changes to staff terms and conditions which include 35 hour work weeks.
  • the cost of employees rose by 1.6% last year to £152 million, see Statement of Accounts here.
  • at its last cabinet meeting on 26th July Ealing Labour cut Supporting People spending on people with housing issues, most of which goes outside the council, by 47%, see paper here.
  • at its cabinet meeting on 7th June Ealing Labour cut the amount it gives to voluntary organisations in the form of discretionary relief from business rates from £396K in 2009/10 to £88K. A cut of 78% or £308K for local voluntary organisations in Ealing, made even worse by the fact that these discounts on business rates are matched by central government to the tune of £197K, 78% of which will be lost too for no gain by the council, see paper here.
  • at its cabinet meeting on 26th April Ealing Labour cut 28% in the health and social care grant budget and 30% in the community grants budget over the three years 2011/12 to 2013/14, see paper here.

What we can see is that Ealing’s Labour council has made very little progress with reforming itself but has taken its own cut in government grant rather than the much lower cut in its overall income as the minimum starting point for the voluntary sector and in the more obscure areas such as rates relief and Supporting People has been truly vicious. Ealing’s Labour council has protected itself and externalised the pain. It is strange to see public service unions calling them out on this. You might have thought that they would be a bit embarrassed.

Categories
National politics

Independent? Unbiased? Not really

Yesterday the Independent made much of this headline and the idea was picked up by the BBC and others. I wonder who thought up the original line? The number comes from taking every News International entry on this list of the Prime Minister’s meetings with proprietors, editors and senior media executives published by Number 10 and adding them up.

There are 74 entries of which some 26 are related to News International. My first observation would be that 36% of the list is News International which pretty much exactly matches its share of the national newspaper market.

Of the 26 News International meetings 10 were one-on-one meetings with the editors of national newspapers:

  • Dominic Mohan, Sun 3 times
  • James Harding, Times 4 times
  • Colin Myler, NOTW 1 time
  • John Witherow, Sunday Times 2 times

These sessions are entirely normal and entirely proportionate. If calling newspaper editors Murdoch chiefs is a tad poetic then the next set of “meetings” make the Independent and the BBC look mendacious:

  • The Sun Police Bravery Awards – twice
  • The Sun Military Awards – once
  • News of the World Children’s Champions – once

There is nothing wrong with the PM deciding to support these causes. Maybe if the Guardian or Observer honoured the police and military the PM would turn up to their dos too.

So we have reduced the Independent’s list from 26 to 12. You get into more questionable areas when you consider that Cameron attended the News International Summer party twice and a News International reception. Three “meetings”. Like Cameron had deep and meaningfuls with anyone at these. In the same period he attended another 8 parties variously related to the news media:

  • FT mid-summer party
  • Spectator summer party
  • hosted two reception for broadcasters and the Lobby at Number 10
  • another one for regional broadcasters and the lobby
  • a party for National Magazines’ 100th birthday party
  • another for the Journalists’ charity
  • hosted a reception for British Society of Magazine Editors
  • hosted a reception for the Regional Lobby

In context 3 out 11 media related parties with News Corp does not seem unreasonable. Perhaps Cameron should party less? Maybe that makes him normal?

The meetings that the public might question are now looking a little thin – down to eight.

Two appearances at the Times CEO Summit. Again deep and meaningfuls? Isn’t this pretty normal along with appearances at CBI conferences or similar? This takes us down to six. The six meetings that Cameron might have avoided or reduced resolve to:

  • One one-to-one with Rupert Murdoch
  • Two one-to-one with Rebakah Brooks
  • One meeting with Brooks and Sun Editor at the Conservative Party Conference
  • One social with Rebekah Brooks and James Murdoch
  • One social with Rebekah Brooks

Maybe Cameron will come to regret these six meetings. Am I alone in thinking that this is not a big deal?

Categories
National politics

Overweening BBC news on strike

I have been turned off the news over the last week or so as a result of the whole BSkyB/Murdoch/News International/hacking thing. The NOTW was pretty evil to do what it did to people. The resulting public anger is warranted. The great big meringue of nothing being blown up by politicians and the non-News International media has bored me rigid though.

This morning I turned on the Radio 4 Today programme, I just can’t stop myself, only to hear a repeat of the Reith Lecture. The NUJ are on strike. They will be on strike again in two weeks time too apparently, see here.

The NUJ are extremely silly. Just when the liberal left nexus of the BBC/Guardian, they have literally been working together on the Murdoch story, have convinced everyone that the big issue with news media plurality in this country is News International and along comes the NUJ to remind us that the BBC dominates our news. Doh!

Just so you know the numbers look at this Ofcom paper. TV has a 73% share of where people get their news from and the BBC owns a 70% share of that.

In addition to the 70% share of TV, the BBC has a 54% share of radio news and 40% share of page views of the top 50 news websites. Sky only has a 6% share of TV news. NI is big in papers, about 35%, but radio and online are almost as big as the newspaper segment. The BBC has a bigger share of radio and online than NI has of newspapers and the BBC’s share of TV news is double NI share of newspapers and a 12 times bigger share than Sky of the TV segment. The real news media plurality story in this country is the vast preponderance of the BBC.

Categories
National politics

It is public service Jim, but not as we know it

The new managing director of the IMF, Christine Lagarde, is all over the news tonight. I am not sure that her salary, which would have to be £700K in London, will be given the same prominence. She is going to cost the IMF at least £1 million a year all told.

Lagarde is undoubtedly a very talented woman who would be quite capable of earning that kind of money in private practice as a lawyer, her previous trade before she became a French politician. But, as the person who is going to have to prescribe a lot of very bitter medicine, her pay packet stinks. The fact that her pay packet is tax free (net of tax) whilst she will be flying around the world prescribing higher taxes and lower government spending is the main cause of the smell in my mind.

Her terms of employment were released by the IMF yesterday, see here, and the IMF are to be congratulated for their transparency. The key section is here:

3. (a) Your salary as Managing Director of the Fund shall be $467,940 per annum. As explained in Section 14(b) of the By-Laws, this salary shall be net of income taxes.
(b) You will receive an allowance in the aggregate amount of $83,760 per annum, similarly net of any income taxes, payable in equal monthly installments, without any certification or justification by you, to enable you to maintain, in the interests of the Fund, a scale of living appropriate to your position as Managing Director and to the Fund’s need for representation. In addition, you will be reimbursed for reasonable expenses actually incurred for entertainment directly related to the business of the Fund.
(c) The Fund will reimburse you per diem at the rate applicable to Executive Directors plus reasonable vouchered expenses not covered by the per diem, including all hotel expenses, incurred by you for travel in the interest of the Fund. Such expenses shall include travel and hotel expenses of your spouse/partner in attending Annual Meetings of the Board of Governors held outside the Washington, D.C. area, and in accompanying you on official travel in circumstances where this is in the interest of the Fund.
(d) Both your salary and your representation allowance will be adjusted on July 1 of each year beginning in 2012 by the percentage increase in the Washington metropolitan-area Consumer Price Index1 for the twelve months ending the preceding May.

Adding her salary and representation allowance, translating into Pounds Sterling at $1.60 to the Pound and grossing up for tax this is the equivalent of earning £700K, inflation linked, without considering the per diem when she travels. I haven’t even started to look at the pension situation. Life is too short.

Whatever this is this is not public service.

Categories
National politics

The pain is necessary

At last night’s cabinet meeting the council was yet again wrestling with the unpleasant business of making do with rather less cash.

This graphic from tonight’s Evening Standard, see article here, shows in the most emphatic way why George Osborne is right and why Ed Balls is wrong. Anyone who tells you that the Coalition government’s deficit reduction policy isn’t necessary really is lying to you or does not understand the consequences of bond rates being in the teens. The loss of spending power families are experiencing now and the retrenchment we are having to inflict on our public services would be a fraction of what would be required if the markets did not believe George Osborne’s plan. Plan B (for Balls) would be national suicide.

Categories
National politics

Nasty party

Jack Dromey’s main qualification for being an MP is that he is the husband of Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, arguably the most PC woman in Britain, although her support of women in the Labour party does not extend to anyone going up against her husband.

Although he is 2010 new boy Dromey’s union and Labour party connections got him elected to the shadow cabinet and appointed as Communities and Local Government shadow. Dromey has failed to make any impression whatsoever shadowing Eric Pickles and there is no-one on the Labour front bench who has proven less effective Dromey.

Clearly his impotence has reduced him to making silly attacks on Pickles’ considerable weight. In the Harman/Dromey world view it is OK to say nasty things about people as long as they are Conservatives. Dromey’s comments were best left unreported and I don’t know why our council leader thinks they need to be repeated outside an internal Labour meeting where maybe they think it is OK.

Categories
National politics

The world is run by those who show up

I saw the Commons Performance Cockpit mentioned on the Guido Fawkes blog yesterday. It is provided by a company called KeyBusinessInsight and visualises Parliamentary data so that you can compare MPs. I looked up our three local MPs.

Tory MP Angie Bray beats her Labour neighbours hands down. Bray costs us £301 per vote. Ealing Southall’s Virendra Sharma costs us £517 per vote and Ealing North’s Stephen Pound costs us £543 per vote.

Angie has her foot to the floor. The Labour boys are coasting. To carry on my motoring metaphor all of our MPs are cheap runners.

Categories
National politics

Mirror, mirror

Labour council leader Julian Bell is known for his direct, partisan brand of Labour politics. Apparently he buys his opinions every day from the Daily Mirror for 45p.

Categories
National politics

Those evil Tories again

Ealing’s Labour housing supremo and Islington council housing officer, Cllr Withani, seems to be happy that the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) is trying to use the legal system to overturn the will of our elected government, see article here.

Apparently CPAG is challenging the national cap on the Local Housing Allowance (LHA), paid to tenants in the private rented sector, and a restriction preventing payments exceeding the cost of renting a four-bed home, regardless of household size. Does anyone remember CPAG going for judicial review in April 2009 as a result of Labour’s James Purnell limiting LHA to the five room rate following from the Acton Afghan case? Labour limits LHA and it is OK. No comment from Cllr Withani and CPAG. The Tories do it and CPAG are off to the courts. Agenda anyone? Oh yes! Don’t expect Withani to be tweeting an explanation anytime soon.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield National politics

More AV stats – Ealing 28th most Yes voting area

Yesterday Paul Goodman of ConservativeHome picked up my “metropolitan silliness” idea although he used the tag “progressive majority”. I did eventually find a spreadsheet of results thanks to Paul and the Guardian, here.

So the ten Yes voting areas were:

Only 41 voting areas in the whole country scrapped over the 40% mark.

The list is either townie or Celtic or both. Ealing is the 28th most Yes voting area in the country. The Yes-es include 6 London boroughs and the over 40% list includes another 9 so central London was very Yes-ey but London overall is still under 40% after Boris’s doughnut is counted.