Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Conservativehome covers Northfield

ConservativeHome, the conservative blog, covered the local elections in Northfield in a piece written by me today. See article.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield Health, housing and adult social services

Ealing Health Profile published

Yesterday saw the publication by the NHS of a health profile for Ealing.

A number of health issues emerge:

  • significantly worse heart disease and stroke
  • significantly worse diabetes
  • significantly worse children’s tooth decay.

I understand that the first two of these are driven in large part by our Asian population (around 25%) who are particularly susceptible to these conditions. See references on heart disease, stroke and diabetes. Much of this early death is preventable and needs to be a priority.

We clearly need more dentists!

Dentists who can reduce problems such as tooth decay, tooth erosion and a lot more. Such instances call for dental implants. So click this link https://www.maestrosmiles.com/dental-implants/ to gain more insights on the same. On the other hand Ealing seems to be good for teenage pregnancy, binge drinking, healthy eating, obese adults, cancer, mental health treatment and drug misuse treatment.

Life expectancy in Ealing seems to be bang on the national average. The overall figure hides a lot of differences between wards. Northolt Mandeville, North Greenford, Perivale, Hanger Hill, Southfield and Northfield have significantly higher life expectancy than the English average. Southall Broadway, Norwood Green, Lady Margaret, Dormers Wells, Elthorne and South Acton have significantly lower life expectancy. The liberal consensus is that deprivation (you are poor) leads to health inequalities. Yes, but in Northolt West End we have a most deprived ward that turns out to have marginally higher than average life expectancy.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield Health, housing and adult social services

MP roasts Royal Free Chief Exec at scrutiny panel

Last night the Health and Social Care Panel, one of Ealing Council’s scrutiny panels, heard John Bercow, Tory MP for Buckingham tear into Andrew Wray the Chief Exec of the Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust. Bercow was pretty full-on, calling Wray “arrogant, incompetent and insensitive”. It was a very parliamentary style of attack. The Princes Room of the Town Hall with its peeling paint and strip lights did not quite provide a setting as grand as Bercow’s rhetoric.

The serious point of the evening was the closure by the Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust of the Nuffield Speech and Language Unit which is effectively a day hospital run by the trust. It is in effect a nursery school too, where a small number of children with profound speech and language problems get intense therapy three times a day.

Ealing PCT and our council officers, and others like them across London who represent the potential users of the unit, subscribe to the “national strategy” which is that specialist units are anathema. The Royal Free is in a bind as they have to take the risk of a shortfall in pupils which forces them to subsidise the few kids who are enrolled at the Nuffield specialist unit.

We heard heartfelt testimony from parents and staff and the reason that Bercow was weighing in was that he has a young son, Oliver, who is a potential candidate.

It was clear to the panel that the consultation on possible closure by the Royal Free has been badly handled and should stop. We would like to see the threat of closure lifted for a year to give the parents and supporters some time to promote the institution. When consultation restarts it needs to consider closure against the idea of re-marketing the whole Nuffield concept.

If the Nuffield is to swim against the tide of inclusion orthodoxy then everyone associated with it needs to band together to ensure that a flow of candidates comes forward. They should not expect some Trust comms department to do this for them. They need to get out and do it for themselves and other like them. We can only afford diversity within public services if the public take some ownership for themselves.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield Health, housing and adult social services

Ealing NHS pulled down by national crisis

Today the BBC covered the financial performance of the NHS. The overall deficit is around £500 million. The Health Secretary, Patricia Hewitt, tries to minimise this figure by making statements like: “The NHS is now stabilising this financial problem while continuing to improve services for patients.” Unfortunately, the current Labour Government is seriously mis-managing the NHS and it is hurting our Borough.

Last night the Ealing councillors on the Health and Social Care Standing Panel had a briefing from Ealing Primary Care Trust (PCT), the people who fund all our GPs, dentists and pharmacies. Both the chairman and chief executive were there. Robert Creighton, the Chief Executive, covered the financial aspects of the talk. This year they were hoping to make £5 million available for new community care initiatives. As a result of the current financial crisis in the NHS Ealing PCT’s entire budget was top sliced by 3% and instead of having £5 million to spend on new activities they were looking at taking £6 million out of their current spending plans.

Robert gave the impression of knowing his stuff and in the last year the PCT performed well financially turning in a small surplus of £2.1 million (the equivalent of 0.5% of their £441 million annual spending).

So although our PCT is well run we will suffer this year from the national crisis.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Meals on wheels cheaper

Ealing’s new Tory adminstration last night made good on another of its manifesto promises. Frozen meals on wheels will be reduced in price from £3 to £2.50 as from 1st July. See press release.

Categories
Ealing envirocrime

Northfield Avenue Envirocrime

On Monday morning Ann Chapman, one of the Tory councillors for Walpole, and I went on a tour of Northfield Avenue and its surrounding areas to review envirocrime hotspots with David Stokes who is the Envirocrime Prevention Area Manager for Ealing.

We looked at:

  • a couple of houses where the resident is causing a nuisance to their neighbours
  • fly tipping at the west end of Graham Avenue
  • Felton Road which has a jungle-like verge
  • flytipping and graffiti on Brisbane Road
  • the service road north of Sainsburys and south of the Uxbridge Road at West Ealing which is being abused by the traders who leave their waste all over and is also used for flytipping.

Some of the flytippers will be in for a nasty surprise over the next few weeks as David has got the use of a mobile camera. We should be seeing some mugshots soon.

On Monday a new graffiti removal contract started with a company called MPM Graffiti Solutions, they also work for Redbridge, Hillingdon and West Sussex. It seems that the old contractor was sacked for poor performance and pretty much gave up for the last two months. This might account for some part of the apparent recent surge in graffiti in Northfield although I feel that there has also been a change in the offenders’ behaviour recently and the death of David Wetmore in December of last year (See Ealing Times link) caused a big upsurge in West Ealing.

I was impressed with David Stokes, who has only been in the job a matter of months. I think we will start to see an improvement in our local environment very quickly. Local councillors are right behind David and his team.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield Ex-Mayor Livingstone Tram

TfL blows £23 million on the Tram

Councillor Will Brooks, Cabinet Member for Environment and Transport, has been chasing Transport for London to tell him what the West London Tram has cost so far using the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Their project “director”, Christopher Dean, wrote yesterday to say that: “Since the inception of the West London Tram project in 2002, Transport for London has spent approximately £23m on the development of the scheme.”

He blathers on: “This development cost is small relative to overall investment in infrastructure that the tram would bring to West London and is entirely in line with other major infrastructure developments.”

No you silly man this is a lot of money to spend on a scheme that we do not want in West London and is now just a totem that allows Mayor Livingstone to talk about how he is “investing” in West London. The reality is that the Tram simply destroys one public transport system (the bus) and replaces it with an unproven one while West London spends four years in chaos not to mention a couple of years of planning blight thrown in.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield Ex-Mayor Livingstone Tram

Mayor brands old Ealing Labour administration as incompetent

Ealing Times today covers the Mayor’s weekly press conference that took place on Tuesday. Mr Livingstone said: “The Labour-run council in Ealing were frankly not good enough in their performance, and the people were deeply unhappy with the incompetence.”

The Mayor would rather blame the Labour administration for Labour’s loss of Ealing than blame the Tram although he did conceded that if public opinion continues to move against the West London Tram the project will have to be reviewed.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield Ex-Mayor Livingstone Tram

Local Labour sees the light, Mayor still not listening

Ealing Times quotes local Labour politicians on their somewhat belated realisation that the Tram might have done for them.

It seems the light has dawned on the likes of ex-leader Thomson and ex-finance portfolio holder Beecroft that ignoring people and trying to foist the West London Tram on them is not a good way of getting elected. The next person who needs to start listening is the Mayor unless he wants to get booted out too in May 2008 just in time so that he can spend lots of time watching the London Olympics.

There is no sign of Ken listening though. He is sailing along with the West London Tram and has just published what is called Supplementary Planning Guidance for consultation (follow link for tedious document). Among other things, this document effectively says:

  • Borough planning policies should seek to help make the Tram successful
  • Boroughs should refuse planning permission for developments likely to prejudice the development of the Tram
  • Boroughs should aid the Tram by supporting a Transport and Works Order Application.

The most Canutian paragraph of this document, paragraph 3.6, is really quite funny:

“As tram schemes, both Cross River Tram and West London Tram projects will be taken forward through an application for powers under the Transport and Works Act (1992) (TWA), and where appropriate the relevant London boroughs should show their support by being prepared to co-promote any such Transport and Works Order Application. The TWA process will help to safeguard and provide for compulsory acquisition of the land required for construction. Appropriate support for the scheme within borough planning documents, including SPG, will be a material consideration at the TWA Inquiry.”

In other words the Mayor is asking for help from the three West London Tram boroughs when two have previously stated their opposition and one will formally change its position on May 18th. The logic of this paragraph is that the three boroughs should look to scupper the Tram by ensuring that their planning frameworks specifically exclude the Tram and make no concession to it whatsoever.

The real issue is why does Ken Livingstone want to proceed with the Tram and initiate the Transport and Works Order process that will lead to a very expensive public inquiry. Could it be that he wants to use the public inquiry, currently scheduled for Spring 2007, as a platform for electioneering for re-election in May 2008? The public inquiry will be futile and extremely expensive. We are talking about £10s of millions. We know Ken likes spending our money like water and he will not baulk at hiring the best barristers he can. This will force objectors, all of us, to spend similarly. The inquiry will become a pre-election political jamboree paid for by us.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Gazette needs to sharpen up

Our main local paper, the Ealing & Acton Gazette, needs to sharpen up its act a bit.

On page 4 of today’s issue they manage to use the names of one of the new Conservative councillors and his running mate on a caption under a photo of two musicians. Obviously, Conservative candidates are multi-talented but there is a limit.

On pages 6 and 7 they cover last week’s local election. Apparently ex-mayor Potts is now called Tan rather Ian. The three Conservative councillors in Northfield, including me, have crossed the floor according to the Gazette and gone over to Labour.

Journalist Lucy Proctor perhaps betrays her own political allegiances. In the piece covering the LibDem performance she fails to convey the information that they lost a councillor.