Categories
National politics

A sentence mangled beyond recognition

I can only imagine that Gordon Brown himself came up with the strap line for the Labour election campaign: “A future fair for all”. What a load of mangled nonsense? What is wrong with: “A fair future for all”. Don’t we traditionally put adjectives in front of nouns in English? Gordon Brown has the strangest linguisitic habits and I can only imagine that he came up with this slogan and resisted all attempts to iron it out.

If you enjoy being patronised then click on Labour’s little video below. I know they are promising to lower the voting age to 16 but do we need to be infantilised like this?

I will flip through the Labour mainfesto later but the Conservatives has already identified 102 broken promises from the 2005 manifesto here. In 2005 they promised:

We will not raise the basic or top rates of income tax in the next Parliament (p.16)

Since then Gordon Brown abolished the 10% rate, Alistair Darling has added new 45% and 50% tax rates and forzen allowances. They are making the same claim again today. Once bitten, twice shy I think.

Categories
National politics

Fisking Labour’s cartoon

In the sweet FFFA the skyline will be dominated by mobile phone masts.

Apparently in Labour’s sweet FFFA it is so dangerous on the streets that policemen don’t just go around in pairs, they steam the streets in packs of eight on bicycles.

Categories
National politics

Slaughter put to the sword (Again)

The Shaun Bailey campaign in Hammersmith continues to do good work in hammering the awful “Andy” Slaughter. Hear him here on LBC Radio today totally failing to justify the £6 billion loss made by Gordon “Get the big decisions right” Brown.

Earlier this week the same team put out this poster:

Categories
National politics

Depressing Plaid Cymru

The excellent Iain Martin at The Wall Street Journal points out that it was all a bit slow today. So much so that Sky was reduced to covering the Plaid Cymru press conference. I heard this being covered on BBC radio too and was profoundly depressed by it. It seems that the main plank of Plaid’s campaign is that the Welsh should clamp their jaws on the teat of state spending and grimly hang on. See their press release here.

Plaid’s Leader Ieuan Wyn Jones AM told the news conference at Plaid HQ in Cardiff:

With the prospect of a hung parliament becoming increasingly more likely, Plaid can and would secure the best deal for Wales and our communities. In a situation where no party has overall control we will be in a very strong position to fight for a fairer funding deal for Wales to protect jobs, schools and hospitals. Who else is going to stand up for Wales and for our communities? Think about it. The greater the vote for Plaid – the better the deal for Wales. This is an opportunity to make a real difference.

What a depressing prescription? No ambition beyond keep on taking from the English. Some kind of nationalist.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Labour go around in pairs

Apparently the local Labour candidates feel the need to go around in pairs when they knock on doors. I guess if you were representing one of the most unpopular governments in history you would be wary of knocking on doors on your own. Hilariously Walpole candidate Rupa Huq today published two photos of her colleagues knocking on doors on her blog here. It seems they have not got the hang of this canvassing thing yet. In Northfield we have been knocking on doors for four years now. We cover a lot more ground on our own!

Categories
National politics

You don’t have to put up with another five years of Gordon Brown

Brown has just got back from the palace. Thank heavens Gordon Brown’s prime ministership is over.

Good bye.

Categories
National politics

Taxing jobs

The letter below (from me) was published in the Telegraph today, follow link.

Tax on employment

SIR – I was pleased to see Britain’s business leaders come out in favour of the Conservatives’ plan to mitigate Labour’s disastrous National Insurance increases (Letters, April 1).

Business leaders might do their staff, and the country, a further service if they spelt out the difference between what they pay for labour and what each individual actually receives in pay and benefits.

Some years ago the P60 form made clear both the employee’s and the employer’s NI contributions; it even had a box showing the total NI outlay for each employee. Over time this box was hatched out and then vanished altogether. Reference to the employer’s NI was removed as the state sought to obfuscate the onerous levy it extracts from even the lowliest worker’s pay.

Might employers provide their staff with a simple statement showing total staff cost and the proportion passed to the state and the proportion passed to the employee? Most people would be shocked at how big the state’s slice of the pie is.

Phil Taylor
London W13

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Ealing Today’s April Fool

I almost started a furious e-mail to Ealing Today to rebut this story until the penny dropped and I realised what it was. Good one.

Root and Branch Change Planned

Group of councils to switch to artificial trees on local streets

A consortium of London Councils including Hounslow, Ealing, Hammersmith and Fulham and Wandsworth are planning to cut costs by switching to the use of artificial trees.

The plan envisages that as trees on local streets die they will be replaced with sophisticated carbon fibre replicas which would be virtually indistinguishable from the real thing.

The consortium believe that this will provide massive budget savings on maintenance and reduce the need to replace paving stones cracked by root growths. Problems caused by falling leaves in the autumn such as blocked drains and people slipping on wet leaves will be a thing of the past.

They expect residents to be pleased as the new trees will reduce the risk of subsidence for houses with trees in the road outside – and sticky deposits from lime trees have been a problem for people parked underneath them.

The new trees will come in a range of traditional British species and will allow the re-introduction of the elm onto London’s streets. They will be preprogammed to ‘shed’ their leaves in Autumn and ‘blossom’ in the spring. It is estimated that it will take around fifteen years for the existing tree stock to be replaced. The consortium has given reassurances that no healthy tree will be cut down unless it is financially advantageous for them to do so.

Spokesperson for the consortium, Avril Amadan said, “Many of our residents are already recognising the environmental benefits of switching from a real tree to an artifical Christmas tree and we are simply following the logic of this idea. Trees are costly to the taxpayer and bad for the planet and we are providing a 21st century alternative ”

The move is likely to be resisted by environmental groups concerned about the loss of the capacity of trees to absorb carbon dioxide. Green lobbying organisation ‘Friends Of Our Locality’ have produced a study that shows that the switch to artificial trees will actually reduce carbon emissions – the need to pollard growing trees and sweep leaves creates more CO2 than the plants absorb they claim.

The hi-tech trees will also be able to contain extra equipment such as traffic monitoring cameras and display panels for the Councils to republish information from their magazines and newspapers.

As the trees will be hollow, the larger varieties may provide a workspace for local monitoring officers. Ealing Council is proposing setting up a unit called Ealing Local Volunteer Executives. These E.L.V.Es would reside in the trees to report breaches of parking and refuse disposal regulations by local residents.

April 1st 2010

Categories
National politics

Department of Government Waste

The Conservatives have put out this hilarious spoof website as an April Fool’s joke. One of the key waste points they raise is the size of centralised government comms spending going through the Central Office of Information which I have been consistently highlighting for a few years now, see here. The total bill was £540 million last year. It is good to see that the Tories have worked out that all of this spending is obscene, not just the £232 million of ad spending, which is where they were at in January. The graph below tells the whole sick making story.

coi-spending-2009