Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Labour’s Bell not earning his pay

Council leader Julian Bell is off on his bike for six days to the South of France. He leaves today and will cycle for six days to Cannes on a charity bike ride associated with the MIPIM property conference which itself runs through to Friday of next week.

Bell takes a salary for doing two jobs. He takes a fulltime allowance to be leader of the council. Unlike his Conservative predecessor Jason Stacey he doesn’t do a fulltime job though. He also works two days a week and draws a salary as a Parliamentary researcher for Southall MP Virendra Sharma. Both of these jobs have extensive holidays. We all know how many days that Parliament has off. The council also goes very quiet during school holidays which is the natural time for councillors to take time off (unless they are Cllr Ed Rennie).

I hope that Cllr Bell raises some money for charity. Maybe, like Cllr Rennie, he will also be giving some of his taxpayer funded income to charity too. Hopefully nothing much will happen over the 10 days or so for his lacklustre deputy, Cllr Ranjit Dheer, to deal with.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Another £31 million of new money the council forgot to mention

Another feature of the council’s finances that Labour are not bragging about, and deplorably the officers seem incapable of communicating clearly to residents either, is the New Homes Bonus. The New Homes Bonus is a grant paid by central government to local councils for increasing the number of homes and their use. You can read more about it here.

So far the government has given local councils £1.3 billion of new money. Ealing has already achieved £31 million of New Homes Bonus. It will get £5.1 million of this money in the next financial year. For more information see Table 4 on page 15 of the budget report.

Like the CT Freeze Grant I talked about on Thursday it isn’t ring-fenced and the council can spend it on what it likes. Added to CT Freeze Grant that is £49 million of new money that the council hasn’t told you about because it doesn’t suit its message. This may be acceptable if unattractive if it is coming from Labour politicians but it isn’t acceptable when it is council officers only telling half the story.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Ealing Freeze paid for by £18 million of government grants

I have had a month off from the blog. Over the next few days I am going to comment on various aspects of the budget that was agreed at the council meeting last Tuesday.

At the meeting the Labour administration used a question to re-announce that they will freeze council tax for their 4th budget next year for the fourth year in a row, they first announced it in the Gazette at the start of the year. This news will be welcomed by most residents and it certainly is by the Conservative opposition on the council. We started the freeze, along with the new London Mayor Boris Johnson in the 2009/2010 financial year. This year bills will even fall slightly due to a cut in the Mayor’s precept.

Labour has not been so keen to re-announce the source of the funding for this freeze. When we set a standstill council tax for two years there was no council tax freeze grant. The current Labour administration has accepted £18 million of grants from central government to freeze the council tax, see Table 3 on page 14 of the budget report. They keep talking about the freeze and they keep telling porkies about their £85 million savings target and calling it cuts but they never tell you that they have had £18 million of new money from central government to fund the freeze.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Should we be paying people to tell us half the story?

You might think that the council’s communications team, who are paid for from public funds, might feel they were under some kind of obligation to act impartially. They might be under an obligation but they show no signs of feeling it!

The council is forever highlighting its savings target of £85 million without putting it in any kind of context that allows people to understand that the real cuts are about 12.5% of total revenue. For instance see the latest issue of Around Ealing above.

The announcement yesterday of a welcome extension to the flats re-cycling service comes with no mention that the capital costs of the scheme, and a wider push to get recycling up, is to be entirely funded by £1.1 million of new money from central government. The Gazette picked up the story but it just lazily repeated the press release.

The first line of the official cabinet report says:

Approves the introduction of the recycling services outlined in paragraph 2.4 below as a result of receiving the external funding from the DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government) Weekly Collection Support Scheme (WCSS).

The background to this is that the council’s officers did well to bid for and win £1.1 million of new money from DCLG to improve the Borough’s re-cycling rate. But, it doesn’t suit the Labour party that this fact is shared with residents. Officers should not be colluding in this.

It is one thing for Labour councillors to only tell half of the story but when the council’s paid employees do it it is simply not on. I have written to the chief executive of the council to complain about the behaviour of his communications officers.

Update: As a result of my complaint to the chief executive the following line got added to the press release:

The above enhancements will be funded following a successful bid from the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG).

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Ealing’s volunteer Streetwatchers unhappy

The council is proposing to mess with the successful Streetwatchers volunteer programme. This has been running for over ten years and there are around 300 Streetwatchers, all volunteers, who help the council to identify fly tips, graffiti and other nuisances. The council has a terrible record on keeping the borough clean having halved the effective Envirocrime service and overseen a nine month period where one quarter of the Borough’s streets were unacceptably dirty.

This latest move further threatens the cleanliness of our borough and upsets a wonderful volunteer resource. The council is proposing to sack the person who has built this team up and move it from the Streets function to the Neighbourhood Governance function. The volunteers haven’t been consulted and don’t like what they are hearing.

The Conservative group wants to see Streetwatchers enhanced and expanded and we can’t see how removing a lynch pin officer will achieve that. If the council is to change anything it needs to get these valuable volunteers onside first. The lack of consultation with the volunteer Streetwatchers shows yet again how dismissive the council officers are of volunteering in general, remember the way library volunteers were treated.

It should be noted that the council is cutting a frontline officer managing 300 volunteers in preference to the post of the Labour group political advisor who the council tax payers of this borough outrageously paid to go the Labour party conference last year. I know which cut residents would choose.

Categories
Mayor Johnson

We have half the fires but the LibDems see a political opportunity

Ridiculously huffy LibDem assembly member Stephen Knight has joined the far left FBU and the Labour party in condemning the London Fire Brigade’s latest ideas about fire planning.

For me the key bit of the LFB press release was the words:

The savings come against a backdrop of the Brigade:

  • Attending half as many fires compared to a decade ago
  • A third fewer house fires than a decade ago
  • Almost a third fewer incidents altogether

In September LFB announced that the number of fires in London has more than halved over the last decade and is now at its lowest point since records began in 1966. The idea that there is not room to restructure the fire service when times are tough and you are doing half the work you were a decade ago is quite laughable.

Fires overall are down 51%, half, from 55,063 in 2001 to 26,845 in 2011.

The overall number of incidents firefighters attend has dropped by 39 per cent from 187,737 in 2001 to 115,126 in 2011 (this includes call outs to things like road traffic collisions, false alarms and non-emergency calls such as to people stuck in lifts). Obviously false alarms and non-emergency calls are not as large a drain on resources as actual fires.

Note that the number of house fires has not diminished as fast as the overall numbers of fires, down a quarter (26 per cent), from 8,940 in 2001 to 6,618 in 2011. This is because commercial property has got a lot safer over the past decade as modern building regulations have forced the modernisation of commercial buildings up to modern safety standards and LFB themselves have done a lot of work to identify and force improvement of high risk buildings. LFB has also worked very hard to push smoke detectors into homes but has not made such a big impact on domestic premises as it has on commercial ones.

For many years now it has been apparent that LFB was wastefully warehousing firemen in beds over night near commercial centres who weren’t doing very much, besides getting a good night’s sleep. The changes announced by LFB take resources away from places where they have much fewer fires nowadays and push them out to the suburbs where there are more fires at night, especially the early mornings.

The idea that a service that is doing literally half of the work that it was ten years ago cannot safely give up some savings is just silly. I can understand the FBU’s position, it is a union after all and will naturally look after its own. The Labour position shows how ill-equipped it still is to govern. The LibDems in government will not thank Stephen Knight for showing the LibDems in the same light.

If people like Knight want to make us all safer he would be better off reminding people not to smoke in bed and to fit smoke detectors rather than indulging in hysterical shroud waving.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield Mayor Johnson

Acton Firestation not going anywhere

Over the autumn Labour and the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) have been trying to get some traction out of firestation closures in London. Locally Labour figures have been scaremongering about the possible closure of Acton fire station. Today it has been confirmed that this will not happen. The fire brigade gives some interesting background that was reflected in the BBC story but not in the Evening Standard piece by Ross Lydall. London Fire Brigade say:

The savings come against a backdrop of the Brigade:

  • Attending half as many fires compared to a decade ago
  • A third fewer house fires than a decade ago
  • Almost a third fewer incidents altogether

The Labour/FBU position is essentially that any change to the LFB estate is a disaster regardless of how much work there is to do. This really is ridiculous. I remember working with LFB in 2003/4. It was obvious then that they were failing to match resources with demand and that this was wasting money. Long-standing Spanish practices resulted in mainly (men) sleeping in firestations overnight in locations where there were known to be no fires at night. It is only the deficit crisis that has caused LFB to finally grasp this nettle. The highly political and leftwing FBU will fight these changes tooth and nail. Labour will try to dramatise the ending of Spanish practices that are ripping off Londoners as dangerous cuts when they are no such thing.

Categories
National politics

One Nation: Hello white, married, wealthy people. We care about you

Interesting to see the image that Labour has chosen to go with its One Nation slogan and line about the impact of government policies on families. It is a stock photo that Labour has bought from an agency that has already sold it to at least two organisations dealing with debt issues:

The choice of image is interesting. No ethnic minorities. No alternative family models. Stereotypical gender roles with mother engaged in childcare and father working on the family finances. The father’s wedding ring in the foreground, left of centre, is consciously the focal point of the image.

The mother figure looks a little tired and washed out and is simply dressed. The father figure has a (literally) blue collar, sleeves rolled up look but this household is firmly middle class, even wealthy by national comparisons. They live in a fully modernised house. Note recessed lights and fire alarm sensor in hall ceiling, modern kitchen unit below mother’s elbow and custom made dresser behind father. The house is immaculately decorated and well furnished. Someone has gone to a lot of trouble to bring out the period features. The period house is comparatively large comprising at least two floors (you can see the stairs) and is large enough to have a kitchen dining area. The fire alarm sensor indicates that they have had a loft extension (the building regs force you to put in a fire alarm when you go up another floor). Most people would have to be high rate tax payers to live in this home, certainly in the South. The middle class values are underlined by the display of the children’s artwork on the stairs over the mother’s shoulder.

Maybe Labour comms people think that this is how the majority of Britons really live. What are they trying to say? Does One Nation mean: “Hello white, married, wealthy people. We care about you.”

Categories
Mayor Johnson

Bottled sunshine

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Labour abuse public money to send their political assistant to conference

My colleague Cllr Mark Reen has used a written question (question 18) to confirm that the Labour group abused public money earlier this year to send their political assistant to the Labour Party conference. Ealing residents will only be dimly aware that the council has political assistants. They will be appalled to learn that someone’s council tax has been used to pay the expenses of one of them to go to a party conference. The language of the council’s response is hilariously circumloquacious. Rather obviously it was the Labour group political assistant who attended the Labour party conference.

Question 18:

Does the Council pay for any Officers to attend party political conferences?

Answer 18:

This would not be appropriate for most council officers and has never happened, save for one of the council’s political assistants, who attended the Labour Party conference in September/October 2012. This was authorised by reason that, as part of the employee officer’s performance appraisal process, developmental objectives were identified that would be met in part by attendance at one of the party political conferences.

The same opportunity was offered to the council’s other political assistant but was not taken up.

How strange? The Labour group PA had unique training needs that required public money to be spent to send him to the Labour conference. The Tory group PA had no such unique training needs and was offered the same deal.

Chief Executive, Martin Smith has made a big error in allowing this I have to say. Council leader Julian Bell should have known better. It stinks. The Labour party in Ealing has a track record of misusing public funds for its own party political advantage. This is just another example.