Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Your road not clean enough? Just make the call

Currently across the whole borough 30% of our streets are not clean enough after the first clean. That is 30% on average for the last 22 months since the contract started in April 2012. There are also something like 4,000 missed collections a month. Every month for 22 months across the whole borough.

On Saturday I was canvassing in Willcott Road in Acton. A lady at the top end complained about repeated missed collections. A young man at the other end had the same complaint. I told them both the same thing. Obviously I would report it but it is only when the council gets a few complaints from residents that they do anything about it. No complaint, no problem.

Last week I enjoyed this piece from Sue Bourne on the actonw3.com website. She said:

The one thing that does annoy me is that when the bin men come round our street – or actually any of the local streets – they leave it looking filthy.. like the third world. So because the bin men patently dont give a stuff about our rubbish and leave it strewn everywhere I don’t think it encourages anyone else to care about keeping the streets clean .. it such a shame.

Again. If no-one reports it, nothing will happen.

If your road is not cleaned to a high standard. If a collection is missed. If recycling containers are thrown around. If the binmen leave a spillage and don’t clean it up. Complain. Call 020 8825 6000 and report it. It is slightly painful and long winded but a supervisor really will talk to the crew and they will most likely improve.

Just make the call.

Freeze strap

Categories
London

London housing is too expensive but Labour’s #ToryHousingCrisis nonsense doesn’t help anyone

London rents up 10 graphicThe great Labour lie machine rumbles on. For the last couple of weeks the London Labour party led by London Mayoral wannabe Sadiq Khan has been going #ToryHousingCrisis crazy.

The graphic they are tweeting is utter nonsense. It is based on a House of Commons Library paper reported here in the Evening Standard. I don’t suppose “journalist” Nicholas Cecil even bothered to read the original paper. I guess he just went with the Labour press release.

The silly apples and oranges comparison made in the paper compares average wages earned in very unusual places like Kensington and Chelsea with private rents in those boroughs. I couldn’t afford to rent in K&C when I came to London in 1984. I didn’t even think about it even though I had a relatively well paid graduate job. I ended up in Willsden Green. The comparison doesn’t include rents paid by people in those boroughs in social homes. It is utter nonsense.

For a bit of sanity go to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) who are working on a new Index of Private Housing Rental Prices (IPHRP). According to ONS in the year to December 2013 private rental prices paid by tenants in Great Britain rose by 1.0%.

IPHRP regional rent increases

LHC_leaflet_frontSure the ONS reckons London rents actually paid by private tenants are rising at a faster rate than the rest of the country – 1.6%. Wherever Labour got its number from it either estate agents’ nonsense or something made up by Labour. The ONS says 1.6%.

The main purpose of this typically mendacious campaign is to drive you to a webpage to sign a petition and give them your details so that they can hassle you electronically in the run up to the London council elections in May.

Update: The Full Fact orgnanisation looked into this and found out where Labour’s number came from. It comes with this qualification:

… the composition of the sample [used to produce rental data] varies over time and therefore caution is advised when drawing comparisons between the statistics reported in the period reported in this release and those for different time periods due to those variations.

Full Fact conclude:

So most of the indicators suggest 10% is an exaggerated figure for London’s private rental market, and we’ll be asking Labour to use more comparable figures for their rental claims.

I am sure Labour will ignore Fullfact’s request.

To find useful information on social security number, click here-application-filing-service.com replacement social security.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Thank Boris, Millican and Mahfouz for the new roundabouts

ChurchroadroundaboutIn his customary first person way Labour’s Cllr Bassam Mahfouz has been trying to take credit for the continuing progress that the Borough is making in improving our roads. Of course none of this would be possible without the work of the previous Conservative administration in Ealing nor the finance provided by TfL as directed by Conservative London Mayor, Boris Johnson.

All of the big road projects in Ealing, outside straightforward road resurfacing, are paid for by Transport for London (TfL) Local Implementation Plan (LIP) funding. London Mayor, Boris Johnson, was elected in 2008 on a platform of “Getting Londoners Moving”. Part of Boris’s vision was to get traffic moving by sweeping away unnecessary traffic lights. Johnson decreed that the boroughs should be given much more flexibility in how they spent this LIP funding. No borough was more enthusiastic about taking up this offer than Ealing under the then transport spokesman, David Millican (now Tory group leader). He led an extensive consultation exercise that led to a raft of proposals that included the roundabout outside Acton Town tube station and the one at the top of Argyle Road. This work was kicked off in early 2009.

Not every scheme was taken forward but the experience gained and the LIP flexibility offered by the Mayor has ensured that the current wave of new roundabouts, at Church Road, at Atlas Road and on Acton High Street, can go ahead.

Before 2008 in London and 2006 in Ealing the transport authorities were locked in an anti-car dogma that not only slowed traffic down but did nothing for safety. Conservatives in City Hall and the Town Hall have made big improvements in our borough’s roads. It is good to see that Cllr Mahfouz is taking them forward temporarily. We will be happy to take up the baton again in May.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Shady far left group hoodwinks TV star into chairing their event

WLEQTIt seems that a shady far left group has hoodwinked ITV star Adrian Chiles into chairing their West London Question Time this coming Wednesday in Hammersmith. Chiles is billed as a “local parent”.

The event organisers say “Everyone is welcome especially parents,
governors and students”. In reality it will be a stage managed event, strictly for the left only. Note you can only ask questions in advance to @NCE2014. Who? More on that later.

The panellists don’t look too extreme – a children’s author, a council leader and a teaching union rep. But look more closely.

The children’s author is Michael Rosen who is a self-confessed fellow traveller with the Socialist Workers Party.

It’s no secret that for many years I was personally and politically close to the SWP and its forerunner the International Socialists. This meant that I read and sometimes wrote for your journals, I supported many of the campaigns you supported or initiated and over the years, I have been personally friendly with several of your prominent members.

The council leader is Ealing’s own Julian Bell who worked with the Ealing Southall MP (who employs him) to try to persuade a Southall school not to become an academy. They failed luckily.

Christine Blower of NUT is known to be a left-wing extremist.

The organiser of this event seems to be an anonymous front organisation called Towards a National Campaign for Education. Their website doesn’t identify any officers, members, etc.

A clue to who is behind all of this can be found on the event poster. The contact details give all away.

WLEQT contact details

Nick Grant is a full-time employee of Ealing Council* who is paid the best part of £80K a year to be a full-time NUT union rep. He uses his time for activities such as co-founding the Anti Academies Alliance, “convening” the Ealing Alliance for Public Services, writing articles for the The Socialist Worker and organising strikes in Ealing’s schools.

So it seems clear to me that this will be a totally stage managed, extreme left wing event. If Adrian Chiles goes through with chairing it all he will do is lend legitimacy to Nick Grant and his SWP clique.

*The council officers have written to me to point out that Grant isn’t employed by the council directly. Technically he is employed by one school. The way the cost of his employment is divided between the Borough’s schools was not explained to me. The effect is the same. I will ask for clarification. I wonder how transparent and subject to scrutiny it is? Grant recently went down 50% time. Again the officers didn’t care to explain what proportion of this was a free gift to the NUT so that he could be a NUT NEC member.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Champion Mahfouz

Last night at Overview and Scrutiny Committee I tried to have a grown up discussion with Labour’s Bassam Mahfouz about the Recycling Rewards scheme, more about that later.

Mahfouz was his usual huffy self. His parting shot was to tell the meeting what a champion of food waste recycling he was. As we had been discussing participation in recycling we had the numbers in front of us from officers. I can only think he wasn’t that familiar with them or he wouldn’t have been quite so full of hubris. Whilst Cllr Mahfouz has been in charge of recycling in Ealing participation in food waste recycling has gone down. With champions like these, we don’t need …

Food waste participation

Categories
National politics

Labour’s #CostofCameron line falls apart when prodded

Cost of Cameron bombshellThis weekend Labour has been running a campaign called the Cost of Cameron. If you had a Labour canvasser knocking on your door he or she might have pushed a card into your hands with this seen-it-before bomb graphic on it.

The reverse has 12 factoids that ram home Labour’s cost of living message. In the posts below this one you will find analysis of these.

CostofCameron back

Maybe I shouldn’t help Labour by debating on their ground but once you scratch beneath the surface of some of these statements two basic truths emerge.

Firstly, we had a big recession in 2008, Labour’s 7.2% single dip recession. It was painful and wage growth has been stunted since then. The good thing is that unemployment has remained relatively low and this has been a good recession in employment terms compared to previous ones. Is Labour saying we should chuck a few 100,000 people out of work and enjoy some robust wage growth for the lucky ones that remain?

Secondly, many prices eased off in 2009 and 2010, as a result of Labour’s 7.2% single dip recession. Now prices are getting back onto a similar track to that which they were on before the recession Labour is trying to kid us that we have lost some kind of low price Labour golden age. The charts show prices were rising just as much if not more when they were in charge as they are now. Energy prices in particular increased more before the recession than they are now.

Having lost the macroeconomic argument on whether Plan A is working or not Labour has alighted on the cost of living as its latest weapon of choice. Labour is doing what the left always does when it loses an argument, it changes the subject. Having changed the subject, it seems their cost of living schtick doesn’t work that well either.

Categories
National politics

#CostofCameron 9: Childcare costs up £304 this year

Childcare graphicI can’t find where Labour got its number from but it looks about right. If you have a child under 2 in 25 hours of childcare you will be spending £5-6K a year, more in London. These bills have been increasing by 5% or more a year for a decade. The Family and Childcare Trust have been tracking childcare bills methodically since 2001. They say in their latest report for 2013:

A nursery place for a child aged two or under is now 77 per cent more expensive in real terms than it was in 2003, with similar rates of increase for children cared for by childminders. An after-school club is now 88 per cent more expensive in real terms than it was in 2003.

Childcare costs

These are big bills, painful and rising fast to be sure. But their graph (on page 11) tells the story – a straight upward line. It was no different under Labour. There is an active political debate around this topic but it is clear that there is nothing new about this. Labour’s solution seems to be make it all go away by having government paying the bills, for those over 2 at least. Not sure how that will tackle the root problem of spiralling labour costs (77% of nursery costs are labour). It will merely nationalise it.

Categories
National politics

#CostofCameron 7: Real wages down £1,600 since David Cameron became Prime Minister

Real wages graphicThe lynch pin of Labour’s mendacious #CostofCameron campaign is this claim.

The £1,600 number used here has already been partially debunked by the Full Fact website. Labour compared average earnings and RPI and worked out that earnings have fallen short of RPI to the tune £1,600. They ignore of course that RPI is a redundant index and that under a more realistic index the loss of earning power would be about £1,000. Labour also ignores that the Coalition has ramped up the personal allowance from £6,475 to £9,440 in three years (worth £593 to most average earners). At the same time the Coalition can boast that for many people mortgage rates have stayed stable due to their macro economic policies. There are lots of swings and roundabouts in this calculation but Labour is exaggerating wildly.

Is it any surprise that wages are under pressure after Labour’s 7.2% single dip recession? The alternative is probably to have higher wage growth and much higher unemployment.

One of the good features of this economic cycle has been that jobs have held up throughout. In a trade off between stagnant earnings and high job losses I think that many of us would say that stagnant earnings is the lesser of two evils. Is Labour really arguing that wage inflation, the scourge of seventies Britain, should let rip pricing 100,000s out of jobs?

Categories
National politics

#CostofCameron 6: Rail fares up 20%

Rail fares up graphicAs a part of its mendacious #CostofCameron campaign Labour is talking about rail fares.

The basic claim is accurate. The last four price rise added (multiplied in the case of % rises) together come to 20.5% although you could quibble that the 2011 rise was almost certainly in the system and locked in before the Coalition had any chance to influence it. Which is a clue to the greater truth. These figures from Railfuture tell all.

Rail fare increases

This year’s rail fare rise was the lowest real terms price increase for 11 years if you think RPI is the measure of choice for inflation (as people do when they want inflation to be high). It was also the 2nd lowest nominal rise for 11 years.

Both Labour and the Coalition stuck to rail fare price increases of RPI+1 for ten years from 2004 in the belief that the burden of paying for rail transport should be shifted from the state to the passenger. This is the first year that the rise has been restricted to RPI rather than RPI+1.

So the Cost of Cameron is lower this year than the Cost of Blair and the cost of Brown. If the Cost of Miliband is going to be lower perhaps he will explain how it will be paid for?

Categories
National politics

#CostofCameron 4: Prices up faster than wages

Prices and wages graphicThis busy little graph is a swizz two times over. First swizz is that it compares wages with RPI which is the largest measure of inflation you can find. So Labour overstate their case. The second swizz is that it leaves out what happened to the left of this picture which only starts in May 2010.

2013-10-28-real-wage-decline-is-a-double-edged-sword-for-the-economy-630x307

I chose this graph from JP Morgan Asset Management because it is nice and clear and puts Labour’s graphic into context. This picture makes it clear that wage growth fell below inflation in mid-2009 when the lines crossed but wage growth turned down markedly in early 2008. What happened then? Oh yes! Labour’s 7.2% single dip recession.

Wage growth in the UK had already been very muted in the UK throughout the noughties due, in most people’s minds, to the availability of cheap, skilled Labour from the A8 countries, notably Poland, who were entitled to work here from 1st May 2004. Labour’s “spectacular mistake” as described by Labour’s Jack Straw. The recession knocked wage growth back even lower and it hasn’t recovered yet.