Categories
Mayor Johnson

Mayor Boris to help people to own their own homes

Back BorisToday Boris Johnson is unveiling his housing and planning manifesto at the Royal Institute of British Architects – I will be going along later. Here is what he has to say:

If we are to improve the quality of life for all Londoners then we must do something about the impact housing has on the rising cost of living. Affordable housing must be more than ‘decent’; it must be desirable.

Furthermore, I will protect London’s green belt, and help regenerate the suburbs by publishing a separate strategy on how to encourage sustainable economic growth in outer London. I will protect the high street by securing affordable retail units for small, independent shops.

I will adopt a fresh approach to housing in London to build varied and vibrant communities, not just tick boxes. If elected as Mayor I will be committed to working in partnership with the boroughs to build a better London – and to leave a lasting legacy for future generations of Londoners.

Some of the details look interesting but need some fleshing out – no doubt the detailed manifesto document will be available later today.

Categories
Mayor Johnson

No more bendies, no more Livingstone

Bendy BusAccording to the BBC today the Mayor has said that there will be no more bendy buses. Could it be that he is rattled by the details of today’s stunning YouGov opinion poll in the Sunday Times which showed Labour 16% behind the Tories – a 25 year low for Labour? The Political Betting website has more details which show that the margin is 25% in London.

Expect to see Livingstone trying to shoot more of Boris’ foxes over the next few weeks. When you lose the initiative you lose.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Southall Black Sisters

Southall Black Sisters (SBS) have certainly been waging an effective media campaign against Ealing council and its plans to look again at how it spends roughly £100K a year helping victims of domestic violence. SBS have been in receipt of a similar sum for a number of years which is effectively about 10% of the council’s current grants budget.

On the one hand the council says they want to commission a more broadly based service with the money that addresses needs across the borough and all communities. On the other SBS say that the money must stay with them. One of the basic chores of being a charity/voluntary organisation is justifying what you do with your grants. The council wants the freedom to decide its priorities and to incentivise the third sector to contribute. SBS don’t want to play the game and they think that they can avoid the process by creating a stink.

The images I have used here come SBS’s Facebook page which has 736 friends. Yesterday Yasmin Alibhai-Brown was writing about them in the Evening Standard and the was a report in the Guardian that the chairman of SBS, one Pragna Patel, has asked David Cameron to intervene.

Picture taken from SBS Facebook page credited to Pickled Politics blog

Categories
Policing

8th teen murder

teen-murder-8.JPGLondon’s 8th teenage murder victim this year was killed yesterday. Michael Jones was beaten to death in Edmonton, see BBC report here and local paper report here.

Four of these murders have happened in Edmonton.

1 January: Henry Bolombi, 18, stabbed
5 January: Faridon Alizada, 18, stabbed
21 January: Boduka Mudianga, 18, stabbed
26 January: Fuad Buraleh, 19, beaten
19 February: Sunday Essiet, 15, stabbed
29 February: Ofiyke Nmezu, 16, beaten
2 March: Teng Le, 17, stabbed
13 March: Michael Jones, 18, beaten

Categories
Mayor Johnson

Livingstone scaring old ladies again

I found this interview with the Mayor on Youtube. If you move the slider to 2:20 he says of Boris Johnson “I don’t believe he will keep the pensioners’ travel as it is”.

The Mayor knows full well that the Freedom Pass is administered and paid for by the London boroughs and that he has nothing to do with it beyond, bizarrely, having the power to impose an agreement when the London boroughs are negotiating with their supplier TfL of which he is the chairman. This arrangement is called the reserve scheme. It has no parallel anywhere else in the country.

Bors Johnson says: “The Freedom Pass will be protected as an untouchable right for London pensioners.”

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

By-election in Greenford

Sonika NirwalApparently Sonika Nirwal, who was until recently leader of the Ealing Labour group, has resigned her council seat too giving rise to a by-election in the Greenford Broadway ward. This will most likely take place along with the Mayoral election on May 1st.

This will be an interesting competition. At the London-wide local elections two years ago there was nothing in it, see results here, and indeed it is a split ward with one Tory councillor, Justin Anderson, and two Labour councillors Julian Bell and Sonika. The margin between Sonika and the next nearest Tory candidate was only 8 votes.

Neighbouring Greenford Green has three Tory councillors, including council leader Jason Stacey.

Which way do you think this will go?

Categories
Comment is free Mayor Johnson

The competence question

cif-london-elections-08.JPG

Having spent yesterday morning going into the City to see Boris’ “The Cost of Livingstone” event and then seeing the coverage of the Mayor’s transport event in the press during the day, see his speech here, I have sought to link the two together and question the Mayor’s claim of executive competence in this piece for the Guardian Comment is free blog.

Categories
Mayor Johnson

Vote Livingstone, get road pricing

Congestion Charge signThis afternoon the Boris campaign is loudly signalling that the Mayor’s transport manifesto launched yesterday in Stratford failed to make mention of his secret plans for extending road pricing across London. Boris says:

It has been revealed today that if re-elected as Mayor, Ken Livingstone will roll out the congestion charge to other London Boroughs such as Bromley, Harrow, Ilford, Romford and Wood Green.

The Mayor failed to include any new details of his plans for this roll out in his transport manifesto launch yesterday, however it has been discovered that he has asked Transport for London to develop plans to extend the charge to the outer London Boroughs.

Commenting on this news, the Conservative Candidate for Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, said:

“It is clear the Mayor wishes to roll out congestion charging more widely in boroughs across London. This is a Mayor who is out of touch with people living in Greater London who rely on their cars because of the poor quality of public transport. No doubt now his plans are out he will deny it – but we must remember that he has form. First it was £5, then £8 and soon to be £25. We cannot trust him on the Congestion Charge.”

It looks like they have picked this up from Ben Webster at the Times today.

Corroboration for this story can be found in “Transport 2025” the Mayor’s 20 year transport strategy. This document makes numerous references to road user charging. TfL says:

Road user charging is generally regarded as the most effective way to match travel demands to available road space. It can also provide additional revenues for expenditure on alternative transport options.

The Government has introduced the TIF to help direct its funding support towards two types of project: “productivity” schemes and “demand management” schemes. TfL is considering its bids for support from this fund.

Furthermore, if a road user charging policy was implemented, an additional increase in bus provision would be required to provide an attractive alternative and support the modal shift away from the car.

In the longer term, major new rail infrastructure needs to be accompanied by further road user charging and land use planning. … The DfT’s feasibility study of a national road user charging scheme projected that charging in areas such as outer London could encourage a shift to public transport and also increase car occupancy.

Don’t forget that the current Mayor, who makes laughable claims of competence, has taken £1.2 billion off Londoners for Congestion Charging, and spent it all, see here, whilst seeing bus operating subsidies (ie not including the capital costs of the buses, infrastructure, etc) rise to £617 million last year, see here.

Categories
National politics

Coming of age ceremonies

This morning the Radio 4 Today programme is talking about Lord Goldsmith’s proposal that children leaving school should pledge an oath of allegiance in a ceremony modelled on the citizenship ceremony for immigrants.

Oath of allegianceI had some recent experience of these as earlier this year I attended my wife’s citizenship ceremony where she pledged an oath of allegiance to the Queen. She is an American who wanted to be able to vote (against Ken Livingstone in particular). On the whole I thought that the ceremony was well done and did indeed make a fitting way to mark the end of the (quite convoluted) journey to British citizenship. I can see how it might be a useful way to mark a child’s coming of age. Maybe it would be more attractive if some kind of party was included in the package!

The oath you have to say in a citizen ceremony is reasonably full-on even for a product of New Labour:

I (name) swear by Almighty God that on becoming a British Citizen, I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second; Her Heirs and successors according to law.

I will give my loyalty to the United Kingdom and respect its rights and freedoms. I will uphold its democratic values. I will observe its laws faithfully and fulfil my duties and obligations as a British Citizen.

It doesn’t take too long to work out what is wrong with our schools when John Dunford from the Association of School and College leaders said it was “a half-baked idea that should be left to go mouldy”. OK so someone representing a union responsible for people teaching our young people writes off a constructive suggestion with name calling. Not very impressive.

Update: New Labour icon, Baroness Helena Kennedy QC, quangocrat extraordinaire, was the first interviewee on Today’s flagship 8:10am slot this morning. On this subject she said: “I’m afraid I groaned … risible … puerile … serious mistake … divisive … coercive … empty gesture …” If this pernicious, Scottish lawyer is that against this idea it must have some merit if only because it so infuriates this pompous, unelected twit.

Categories
Ex-Mayor Livingstone

Mayor’s piggy bank

Yesterday the excellent Burning Our Money blog carried this story about the London Development Agency (LDA), otherwise known as the Mayor’s piggy bank.

The blog carries this extract from the LDA’s Corporate Plan, click to enlarge:

LDA 2007-8 output targets

Apparently in the areas of of Employment Support and Skills the LDA only aims to help BAME people or women. White men are not welcome. It is not clear whether the disabled quota can be white men or whether they also have to be either black or women to qualify for help.

Too much of the LDA’s £750 million budget for economic development, they are meant to be London’s economic development agency, is spent according to the Mayor’s whim hence the soubriquet “Mayor’s piggy bank”.

If you accepted that public money really could be used to promote economic development then you might think that the way to achieve this might be to try to back winners, or, if you thought that this was beyond the wit of civil servants, then maybe simply to raise up young people so that they are equipped to join the workforce. Unfortunately, this is not the main priority for the LDA.

One example of misuse is the £7 million given to the Tate 2 years ago, see here. Why does Tate Modern need help from the LDA when it is already the most visited tourist attraction in London with 4.9 million visitors? This is a national institution with an international reputation and it can look after itself.

Another example is £2.4 million thrown at the Tour de France Grand Depart last year. Again why did this bunch of drug cheats on wheels get cash that was supposed to raise up our young people?

Another £20 million has been taken out of the LDA for the Mayor’s London Youth Offer, ie the Mayor augmenting a central government programme. However laudable youth services might be, since when is this in the Mayor’s remit?