Categories
Policing

Judge Judge speaks out about knife crime

It is good to hear that the judiciary are hearing the people. Hilariously named senior judge Sir Igor Judge, who is the President of the High Court Queen’s Bench Division, was quoted in the Telegraph today:

Carrying a knife or offensive weapon without reasonable excuse is a crime which is being committed far too often by far too many people. Every weapon carried about the streets, even if concealed from sight, even if not likely to be used or intended to be used, represents a threat to public safety and public order. That is because, even if carried only for bravado or carried for some misguided sense that it would be used in possible self-defense, it takes only a moment of irritation, drunkenness, anger, perceived insult, or something utterly trivial like a ‘look’, for the weapon to be produced. Then you have mayhem, and offences of the greatest possible seriousness follow, including murder, manslaughter, GBH, wounding and assault.

Offences of this kind have recently escalated. They are reaching epidemic proportions. Every knife or weapon carried in the street represents a public danger and, therefore, in the public interest, this crime must be confronted and stopped. The courts will do what they can to reduce and, so far as it is practicable, eradicate it. In our view, it is important for public confidence in the criminal justice system that the man or woman caught in possession of a knife or offensive weapon without reasonable excuse should normally be brought before the courts and prosecuted. Even if the offender does no more than carry the weapon, even when the weapon is not used to threaten or cause fear, when considering the seriousness of the offence, courts should bear in mind the harm which the weapon might foreseeably have caused.

So, the message is stark: this is a serious offence and it should be treated with the seriousness it deserves.

Welcome to our world Judge Judge.

Categories
Customer Services

Customer services have a good day

Today I had a meeting cancelled on me this afternoon so I decided to do a bit of mystery shopping at the the council given that I am about to confirmed as the cabinet member responsible for the customer services function in Perceval House at tonight’s Annual Council meeting.

I walked in and told the meeter and greeter lady that I wanted to get a parking permit. She attempted to check that I had completed a form already and that I had the right id documents. I explained that I was a just checking and she gave me a ticket anyway. I got past her at 15:06 hours. The customer services area seemed pretty serene and well organised. There were screens giving some indication of what was going on. There were 6 people waiting for parking permits (and vouchers) and 10 people waiting for student finance issues. While I waited I chatted to about 20 different people. All bar one was happy with the service they were getting. Some of the students had been waiting for 20 minutes but they were aware that they were pressing against a deadline so were phlegmatic about the wait. Similarly with housing benefit claimants. People waiting on parking had been waiting about 10 minutes. One lady was back for the 4th time to discuss getting a new food re-cycling bin. This seemed ridiculous and was the only bad story I heard.

I was seen at 15:25 after a 19 minute wait. The chap was very pleasant. I obviously didn’t want to take up his time but I learnt that it was a pretty quiet day. He reckoned I should come back next Tuesday after a Bank Holiday weekend just before a month end – it would be a much busier. I might just do that.

On the whole I got the impression that things were working well here. I do accept that it might have been a good day – I will be back, often.

Categories
Uncategorized

Size matters

A while back I whinged about the UK passport service. Today, thanks to my daughter, I experienced the American version. It seems that rubbish passport services are not a uniquely British phenomenon. Months ago my American wife made an “appointment” for 2.15pm for us to go to the US Embassy in Grosvenor Square to sort out a US passport for our new daughter. She already has a British one delivered relatively painlessly through the mail, although with the drawback that you have to send of your documents off for some weeks.

size-matters.JPGThe so-called appointment turned out to be three hours of queuing and waiting around in their Soviet-style waiting room. Finished in 1960 the embassy really does have that 1950s state architecture look. We arrived half an hour early and queued to get through security and then we queued to get a number so that we could wait around. Only it transpired that our photo was a British passport photo and therefore too small for an American passport application. They need a 2″ x 2″ photo. The lady did helpfully point out that there was a handy chemist shop in North Audley Street that would sort things out. So, whilst my wife queued to pay $150, I ran out to the chemists. This was the best part of the experience.

Two very friendly and polite South Asian guys got out a baby chair and white cloth to make a makeshift photo booth. They had an expensive looking digital camera and conferred over a couple of shots before they pronounced themselves happy. For the excellent price of £7.50 I got a quick, efficient and friendly service. These guys should be running the embassy.

Back at the embassy, the queues had all melted away. It seems they don’t really run an appointment system it is either AM or PM. Everyone comes in a rush at the start of the session and that is the batch of work for the morning or afternoon. It boggles my mind that they make whole families go through this rigmarole. The waiting room was full of unhappy families, some with crying toddlers, others with tiny babies who had obviously been conned by the talk of an appointment. You wouldn’t choose to make a newborn baby wait around for 3 hours. For us it was two wasted half days out of work plus a £100 bill (as well as everything else you need to pay £16 to use their courier service). The only blessing was that the baby didn’t melt down on us.

Categories
Mayor Johnson

London in the Sunday papers

London has been in the Sunday papers over the weekend. There are three stories which all touch on policing/public safety in some way.

The Sunday Times has been reporting that Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Ian Blair, has been told that he will not have his contract renewed. Apparently he is not only out of favour with the new mayor but also with the Labour government.

Blair’s contract runs out in January 2010. This is a problem as we will most likely still have a Labour government and a Labour Home Secretary by then. This means that we will have a another Labour placeman as commissioner for five years after Labour inevitably leave power in May 2010. Hopefully Blair will use his last two years to focus on driving out knife crime and other violent crime.

The Mail on Sunday has an interesting piece on how the new Mayor is going to cut out City Hall junkets in favour of public safety spending. No doubt it presages some initiatives to be announced next week.

Finally, there is a piece from Boris in the News of the World which is part of their “Save our streets” campaign:

I was as sickened and horrified as everyone else in Britain by the murder of altar boy Jimmy Mizen at a baker’s shop in London last weekend. It was a tragic reminder—as if we needed one—of the problems we face throughout Britain today. Last year in London alone 27 teenagers were murdered.

Categories
Policing

Jenny Jones is a card carrying idiot

Today Jenny Jones, one of the two Green party members of the London Assembly, is quoted by the BBC as saying:

Stop and search already disproportionately targets young people from ethnic minority communities and this aggressive approach has, in the past, had the long-term effect of alienating the young people it is seeking to protect, as well as having a damaging effect on community relations in London.

She added that she will raise her concerns at the next Metropolitan Police Authority meeting on 29th May and will ask for a report into the potential long-term consequences of reducing the safeguards in the stop and search process.

Her comments are in response to Tuesday’s announcement that the Met will use their powers under section 60 of the Public Order Act to stop and search people without the need for reasonable suspicion.

By contrast the new mayor has said:

I welcome this new initiative by the Met and I believe that Londoners will also be reassured to see the police being proactive in the fight back against the terrible scourge of knife crime.

Quite right Boris. Totally wrong Jones.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

New portfolio

Ealing TownhallThe Ealing Times is reporting on the new cabinet, see here. This information was published on the Ealing Council website. Like most things on the website it is a bit obscure but it is there! Follow this link to see one of the papers for the Annual Council meeting next Tuesday.

The Annual Council is a short formal meeting which marks the start of the municipal year, sees the election of a new mayor and deputy and ratifies the council leader’s choice of cabinet. He has asked me to take on a new portfolio called Customer and Community Services. This incorporates most areas of the council where we deal with the general public, everything from the help desk to libraries.

Categories
Mayor Johnson

Self preservation

The Mayor has been quick to follow up on one of his election promises to make life easier for Black Cab drivers by removing the half-yearly inspection which only came in October last year.

I anticipate more Black Cab friendly measures from this Mayor as long as he keeps on cycling in to work. It is simple self-preservation. The Sunday Mirror pictures not only showed him breaking the rules but also chatting to two cab drivers. God help him if he crosses the cabbies they will knock him into the gutter double quick. It is not as if he is not easy to spot on his bike.

Seriously though all good red-tape slashing stuff.

Categories
Ealing and Northfield

Ealing Hospital – could do better, much better

Ealing Hospital.jpg

Today the Healthcare Commission has published various summaries of its latest patient satisfaction survey, see BBC coverage here and Ealing Times. Amongst this wave of numbers is a report detailing Ealing Hospital Trust’s performance, as judged by its own patients, follow link.

According to the BBC Ealing is amongst the worst ten hospital trusts in the country. The Ealing report makes pretty poor reading. In 44 out of 62 questions Ealing was in the lowest 20% of NHS trusts. It was at the bottom of the class in the following seven areas:

  • Did you have confidence in the nurses treating you?
  • Did a member of staff explain the risks and benefits of the operation or procedure?
  • Did a member of staff answer your questions about the operation or procedure?
  • On leaving hospital, did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition?
  • Did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?
  • How would you rate how well the doctors and nurses worked together?
  • Overall, how would you rate the care you received?
Categories
Communications disease Mayor Johnson

The Londoner is dead

Today the Mayor announced that the Londoner is dead and that some of the money will be used to buy 10,000 new street trees over the next four years. I am happy that the Londoner has gone but as a local councillor perhaps less so that the Mayor is treading on the boroughs’ toes. Street trees are clearly a local authority responsibility, at least on their own roads.

Anyone who lives in Ealing knows that we have just planted 100s of our own trees over the last winter. The Mayor’s announcement mentions that these new trees will be going 250 at a time to 40 “areas of London that need them most”. Again, most wonderful but does that mean that he will effectively be subsidising feckless Labour boroughs that refuse to spend out on street trees whilst careful boroughs that provide street trees will not benefit?

Our source from NSTS Lilburn points out that the sums are interesting. Overall spending on the Londoner was set to be £2.9 million in the current financial year. Trouble is not much of this came from the GLA. In 2006/7 £504K came from the GLA, £1.5 million from TfL, £500K from the LDA and £250K from the Met. It will be interesting to find out who got their money back. You’d hope that the Met did. Again the LDA cash should be used for hard economic development not prettifying the streets of London. I guess you can make a case for taking £500K off TfL to make walking more attractive. They would be glad to get £1 million back I expect.

Categories
Mayor Johnson

Boris still going strong

A week since the election and Boris is still going strong with more frantic new broom type sweeping from the new mayor. Today we hear he is sending in the heavies to both the GLA and the LDA to find out where our money is going.

It is striking how he is using the expertise of the Tory borough leaders. He has hired two from Westminster and Bexley and now two more are lending a hand from Hammersmith & Fulham and Wandsworth.

Stephen Greenhalgh, leader of Hammersmith & Fulham is famous for cutting their council tax by 3% two years running since his gung ho young group were elected in May 2006. Edward Lister has 15 years experience as leader of Wandsworth grinding out efficiencies. The A Team are on the job.

The Evening Standard is also reporting that the Chief Executive of the LDA, Manny Lewis, has been given six months pay to go quietly. He will be replaced by Westminster council chief executive Peter Rogers. I suspect we will be seeing a lot more bang for the LDA buck very shortly.